There Was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Fly by Pam Adams (author) (UK edition)

There Was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Fly

Suitable for 3 - 7 years

This product is not currently available.

To help you find what you're looking for, see similar items below.

This item has 4 stars of a maximum 5

Rated 4/5 from 4 ratings

1 review (Add a review)

Delivery information

We are only able to deliver orders to school addresses

  • FREE delivery for schools*
  • Delivery within 10 working days

Book Club orders

  • FREE delivery to schools
  • Books will be despatched after the school's order is confirmed

*We do not charge for delivery, but your order may incur additional customs costs.

Delivery information and refund and returns policy

Product description

The vibrant traditional story is retold in a brilliant peephole format that lets little fingers explore to their hearts’ content! Building up suspense through lots of rhyme and repetition, it’s a great choice for reading aloud. Children love peeping into the old lady’s tummy to see the creatures wriggle and jiggle! She’s swallowed a fly, she’s swallowed a spider, she’s swallowed a cat… whatever next?

Product Details

Format

Paperback

ISBN

9780859530187

Publisher

Child's Play (International) Ltd

Date published

August 1st, 1973

Lexile measure

AD390L

Other details

  • 16 pages

Condition

New

UK edition

Reviews

  1. Natasha, Scholastic Staff
    on 21 April 2011

    Funny and Playful

    Surprisingly humorous, There was an old lady who swallowed a fly, keeps you guessing what she will swallow next! This beautifully crafted picture book is perfect for young readers who will love the amusing rhymes throughout.

Add a review

What kids think

  1. pawprint2
    on 16 October 2011

    Soooooo funny

    5out of 5
  2. cleopatra15
    on 7 March 2010

    i loved this book when i was little. it is very funny and amazing how she can fit such large animals into her tummy.

    5out of 5
  3. elliebobster
    on 7 March 2010

    i thought this book was funny but it could do better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    5out of 5